2022 Z71 Suburban 6.2L bent lifters (2024)

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointingto Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them andmake a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

  • Jan 24, 2022
  • #21

R

robhotdog

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Posts
32
Reaction score
22

AmazinglySmooth said:

Seems the bent lifter issue is still happening. My 2022 Z71 with 2300 miles got towed off to the dealer today since it lost power and had tons of errors/alarms. I just heard from the dealer that the lifters are bent. I waited specifically for a 2022 because of this issue, but it happened. They are also not offering the same as is mentioned here: GM Authority Link

The lifters arnt bent..they stick in down position. I suggest after you get it back put a AFM DELETE module on the ALDL connector. Cheapest way..I've got a 07 with 210k..and a 17 with 50k..no problems at all..no difference in mileage and actually runs better..it deactivates the afm lifter functions..back to normal v8 valve train operation. Easy fix for peace of mind.

  • Jan 24, 2022
  • #22

D

dirkw

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jan 5, 2022
Posts
1
Reaction score
0

AmazinglySmooth said:

Seems the bent lifter issue is still happening. My 2022 Z71 with 2300 miles got towed off to the dealer today since it lost power and had tons of errors/alarms. I just heard from the dealer that the lifters are bent. I waited specifically for a 2022 because of this issue, but it happened. They are also not offering the same as is mentioned here: GM Authority Link

I believe that the Technical Bulletin has been updated to replace both banks of lifters. It was in another thread on this forum.

  • Jan 24, 2022
  • #23

AmazinglySmooth said:

They are only replacing one side per approval from GM. Cam shaft inspection says it is ok. Not very pleased after dumping so much cash on this vehicle.

I had same problem with 2021 Tahoe, died at 466 miles, lost power while driving and would not restart. They replaced both lifter banks, said poilicy was to replace both if vehicle had less than 8K miles.
Drove it to Fl last week from NC, have about 2200 miles on it, so far so good. I have filed a complaint with GM Customer Care, just in case something else major happens.

  • Jan 25, 2022
  • #24

SSGUNNER

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Posts
343
Reaction score
220

robhotdog said:

The lifters arnt bent..they stick in down position. I suggest after you get it back put a AFM DELETE module on the ALDL connector. Cheapest way..I've got a 07 with 210k..and a 17 with 50k..no problems at all..no difference in mileage and actually runs better..it deactivates the afm lifter functions..back to normal v8 valve train operation. Easy fix for peace of mind.

The afm delete modules from Range are ONLY for 19+ silverados and sierras. There is none for the 21+ SUV’s per their website and customer service. If it were out I see a lot of folks owning some. Supposedly ecm is locked…

  • Jan 25, 2022
  • #25

2

21TahoeDisappoint

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jun 7, 2021
Posts
21
Reaction score
11

I don't understand the perspective that this lifter issue is due to a bad batch of parts. If so, GM would have/should have announced a recall, as they would know what vehicles had the "bad" parts. The fact that this issue continues, and now is seen in 2022 models, is evidence (in my view), that this is a design flaw and not associated with out of spec parts. Furthermore, the failure mode is fairly high (based upon my conversations with my service advisor). So this isn't something that I thought "oh this happens, but it will be fixed and I'll go on down the road with my new $80k vehicle". I dumped it immediately, and glad I did as we see subsequent failure on vehicles with both banks repaired.

I'm done with GM forever. Not only is the approach of letting the general public vet new technology and design (at the publics' cost and inconvenience) irrational, but the absolute absence of honest communication and proposal of a cogent resolution is unforgivable. Doesn't GM understand the value of brand and reputational damage?

  • Jan 25, 2022
  • #26

Quark

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Posts
553
Reaction score
412
Location
Atomic Nuclei

I think it wise to avoid situations that might make me want to grab a gun.

  • Jan 26, 2022
  • #27

W

wsteele

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2020
Posts
1,731
Reaction score
2,347

21TahoeDisappoint said:

I don't understand the perspective that this lifter issue is due to a bad batch of parts. If so, GM would have/should have announced a recall, as they would know what vehicles had the "bad" parts. The fact that this issue continues, and now is seen in 2022 models, is evidence (in my view), that this is a design flaw and not associated with out of spec parts. Furthermore, the failure mode is fairly high (based upon my conversations with my service advisor). So this isn't something that I thought "oh this happens, but it will be fixed and I'll go on down the road with my new $80k vehicle". I dumped it immediately, and glad I did as we see subsequent failure on vehicles with both banks repaired.

I'm done with GM forever. Not only is the approach of letting the general public vet new technology and design (at the publics' cost and inconvenience) irrational, but the absolute absence of honest communication and proposal of a cogent resolution is unforgivable. Doesn't GM understand the value of brand and reputational damage?

If it were a design problem, the failures would have started in the ‘19 model years (when the L84 and L87 was first introduced) and carried through ‘20, ‘21 and ‘22 with a distribution likely similar in each year.

While I understand your disappointment in getting what you considered a defective product, I don’t understand why that disappointment is so strong that it blinds you to the simple fact that they had a batch of bad lifters that got installed in some of these engines. BTW, there were also a batch of bad valve springs also installed in some of the engines (L87 only) and whose failures have been misatributed to a lifter problem (the window for those parts is a little shorter than the lifter window). People forget factories all over the world were dealing with COVID during this timeframe, everyone was all screwed up.

  • Jan 26, 2022
  • #28

Doubeleive

Wes

Supporting Member

Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
24,322
Reaction score
35,839
Location
Stockton, Ca.

mightymouse said:

Curious. Did you own a model from the previous generation? If so, did you notice more engine noise with your '22? I own a '17 and '22; the engine in my 22 seems to be louder and produce more noise. This is concerning as there may be a solid chance I will be joining the failed lifter club with a '22 at some point. I'm hoping this isn't the case, but the engine noise gives me doubt.

they made the engine compartment smaller

  • Jan 26, 2022
  • #29

Quark

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Posts
553
Reaction score
412
Location
Atomic Nuclei

wsteele said:

If it were a design problem, the failures would have started in the ‘19 model years (when the L84 and L87 was first introduced) and carried through ‘20, ‘21 and ‘22 with a distribution likely similar in each year.

While I understand your disappointment in getting what you considered a defective product, I don’t understand why that disappointment is so strong that it blinds you to the simple fact that they had a batch of bad lifters that got installed in some of these engines. BTW, there were also a batch of bad valve springs also installed in some of the engines (L87 only) and whose failures have been misatributed to a lifter problem (the window for those parts is a little shorter than the lifter window). People forget factories all over the world were dealing with COVID during this timeframe, everyone was all screwed up.

I've been watching the number of lifter failures increase since the introduction of DFM in the 2019 pickups. It's pitiful the way GM charges for these vehicles and does the least possible for their customers when they break.

General Motors V-8 engines are no stranger to lifter problems. Owners of GM V-8 engines with Active Fuel Management (AFM) have dealt with stuck and collapsed lifters for years. But it seems a new round of lifter woes are hitting GM truck engines with relatively low mileage.

The GM lifter problems affect both the 2019-2021 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups as well as their GMT T1XX platform SUV siblings, the Chevrolet Tahoe, Chevrolet Suburban, GMC Yukon and Cadillac Escalade.

2022 Z71 Suburban 6.2L bent lifters (5)

Are there new problems with GM V-8 engine lifters lurking?

GM lifter problems are hitting V-8 truck engines with relatively low mileage. And, while there's a fix, there is no recall.

2022 Z71 Suburban 6.2L bent lifters (6)pickuptrucktalk.com

  • Jan 26, 2022
  • #30

W

wsteele

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2020
Posts
1,731
Reaction score
2,347

Quark said:

I've been watching the number of lifter failures increase since the introduction of DFM in the 2019 pickups. It's pitiful the way GM charges for these vehicles and does the least possible for their customers when they break.

General Motors V-8 engines are no stranger to lifter problems. Owners of GM V-8 engines with Active Fuel Management (AFM) have dealt with stuck and collapsed lifters for years. But it seems a new round of lifter woes are hitting GM truck engines with relatively low mileage.

The GM lifter problems affect both the 2019-2021 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups as well as their GMT T1XX platform SUV siblings, the Chevrolet Tahoe, Chevrolet Suburban, GMC Yukon and Cadillac Escalade.

2022 Z71 Suburban 6.2L bent lifters (7)

Are there new problems with GM V-8 engine lifters lurking?

GM lifter problems are hitting V-8 truck engines with relatively low mileage. And, while there's a fix, there is no recall.

2022 Z71 Suburban 6.2L bent lifters (8)pickuptrucktalk.com

You won’t get an argument from me with regard to the hamfisted way GM has dealt with this issue. On the other hand people sit back and make generalizations regarding the “lifter problems”, like these lifters are just waiting to fail. That is just flat wrong. GM has built over a million of this latest generation engine, they see what is reported by one person as a “bent lifter” in a 2022 model and immediately say, “ ah ha!, see they are still failing!” They don’t fail like that, so likely the service writer probably didn’t understand what the tech said about the problem, but right away, we have ongoing lifter failure issues, at least on the internet.

I have a 2007 Yukon I bought new. I never knew about the “AFM lifter problem” until I got onto the internet and read how bad it was and how I should replace my cam and lifter with a non AFM variety. I went to my trusted service advisor, the same guy I have always gone to when I started with this dealer and asked him what I should do about my AFM lifters, as my engine was well into six figures and likely was about to have AFM lifter problems.

My service advisor said, “yeah, I have heard about those issues…. BUT, I have never seen a failed AFM lifter”, “just keep maintaining it like you do and start worrying about other things.” My dealer is the biggest GMC truck dealer in the state. Now, this was way before the 2021 MY bad lifter debacle and he got a PhD on the subject when they started to show up on one of his biggest fleet customers who bought a slug of early 2021 trucks that they maintain.

He has replaced a bunch of lifters on a lot of trucks that were produced during the bad lifter window period. They have never had a single lifter they have replaced come back in to be redone, zero.

The internet is an echo chamber of bad data flying around, the badder the misinformation, the more it is repeated.

Again, that doesn’t absolve GM from lousy customer service on the issue, but frankly, can you blame the people running GM?

Last edited:

You must log in or register to reply here.

2022 Z71 Suburban 6.2L bent lifters (2024)

FAQs

Does the Chevy 6.2 have lifter problems? ›

However, when the lifter is stuck the camshaft hits the rollers harder than it is supposed to, causing damage. The affected motors seem to be the 5.3L V8, the 6.0L V8, and the 6.2L V8. With that being said, other contributing factors make the motor more prone to having these failures.

Does GM have a recall on lifters? ›

General Motors has not issued a recall for the hydraulic valves, but if your vehicle starts presenting these problems, the vehicle should actively be brought in to be serviced for repairs as soon as possible.

Is there a class action lawsuit against GM for lifter failure? ›

Which vehicles are impacted? The GM engine valve-lifter class action lawsuit seeks damages for anyone who purchased or leased any 2014 to 2021 Buick (see also Buick lemon law), Cadillac, Chevrolet, and GMC vehicle equipped with a 5.3L, 6.0L or 6.2L V8 engine, and include the following cars: 2014 to present GMC Sierra.

What are the symptoms of GM lifters failing? ›

The symptoms of a cam or lifter failure usually involve a chirping, ticking, squealing or squeaking sound accompanied by a Check Engine light and engine misfire codes stored in memory. The misfire condition may not be evident to the vehicle operator.

Are lifters covered under the Chevy powertrain warranty? ›

Also included are all actuators and electrical components internal to the engine (i.e., Active Fuel Management Valve Lifter Oil Manifold, etc.), cylinder head, block, timing gears, timing chain, timing cover, oil pump/oil pump housing, OHC carriers, valve covers, oil pan, seals, gaskets, manifolds, flywheel, water pump ...

How do you know if lifters are bad? ›

Instead of a knock or pinging sound, a faulty lifter will create a tapping sound within your engine which can quickly get annoying. The tapping will occur at a high rate and is more likely to happen when the car is hot or cold, depending on the lifter's issues.

What causes GM lifters to collapse? ›

We have found that most lifter faults are caused by oil pressure issues, or control issues. The AFM activation and deactivation is controlled by the Valve Lifter Oil Manifold or VLOM.

What is the problem with the GM 6.2 gas engine? ›

As the crankshaft spins, it pushes the pistons up and down in the cylinders using the rods. If the 6.2L engine overheats for any length of time, the high temperatures could damage the crank and cause the pistons to seize. If that happens, you'll need a full engine replacement.

Is there a class action lawsuit against GM? ›

General Motors, et al., Cohen Milstein and plaintiffs' counsel continue their litigation in Speerly, et al, v. General Motors, LLC, which was certified as a class action on March 20, 2023.

How much would a shop charge to replace lifters? ›

Expect to pay somewhere between $1000 and $2,500 to get a professional to replace an engine lifter.

How much will I get from the GM lawsuit? ›

There are about 38,000 people that are part of the class-action case, according to Automotive News. Each of them could get $2,700.

How to join GM class action lawsuit? ›

Join the General Motors Class Action Lawsuit

You shouldn't have to pay for a manufacturer's negligence – call (888) 760-2313 now or complete our FREE online consultation form.

How do you test a lifter? ›

Testing A Hydraulic Lifter

The lifter is placed in the cup and covered with light oil. The steel ball is put into the pushrod cup and the plunger worked until the lifter is full of liquid with no air bubbles. Then, the arm is adjusted to ensure that the ball in the pushrod cup is just touching it.

Is a lifter tick a major problem? ›

If you hear lifter noise, get it checked out. Sometimes they'll hold up for a while, but if it's bad enough the lifter could shatter. If it's caught early on, a new lifter is all you'll need - if neglected, a lifter can ruin a camshaft or entire engine in no time.

What causes LS lifter failure? ›

LS Lifter oiling issues

Sludge inside the lifter may cause the plunger to stick and tick on start-up until the engine is warm. Along with poor oil change schedules, bearings and other mating components may have their tolerances worn beyond expected lifespan.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lilliana Bartoletti

Last Updated:

Views: 5821

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lilliana Bartoletti

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 58866 Tricia Spurs, North Melvinberg, HI 91346-3774

Phone: +50616620367928

Job: Real-Estate Liaison

Hobby: Graffiti, Astronomy, Handball, Magic, Origami, Fashion, Foreign language learning

Introduction: My name is Lilliana Bartoletti, I am a adventurous, pleasant, shiny, beautiful, handsome, zealous, tasty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.